<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rule of Law Restoration &#187; Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/tag/constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com</link>
	<description>Sensibly restoring the rule of law to The United States of America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:07:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Passion Trumps Law?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2010/04/03/passion-trumps-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2010/04/03/passion-trumps-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 01:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ruleoflawrestoration</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawlessness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Hare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruleoflawrevolution.com/?p=834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a prime example of how impassioned socialism treats the Rule of Law as a needless hindrance to progress, Illinois Congressman Phil Hare says &#8220;I don&#8217;t worry about the Constitution on this&#8221;.  He was speaking of the &#8220;Health Care Reform&#8221; debacle.  He appears also to have claimed to have read the legislation not just once [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2010/04/03/passion-trumps-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just what is a &#8220;Centrist&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2009/04/25/just-what-is-a-centrist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2009/04/25/just-what-is-a-centrist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ruleoflawrestoration</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centrism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centrist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leftist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriot Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rightist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruleoflawrevolution.com/?p=668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing on the topic of political labeling, I thought it would be good to address the title of &#8220;Centrist&#8221;. Here are a few definitions I found at Google: a person who takes a position in the political center supporting or pursuing a course of action that is neither liberal nor conservative wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn In politics, centrism [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2009/04/25/just-what-is-a-centrist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is this guy?  A &#8220;liberal&#8221; or a &#8220;conservative&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2009/04/25/what-is-this-guy-a-liberal-or-a-conservative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2009/04/25/what-is-this-guy-a-liberal-or-a-conservative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ruleoflawrestoration</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Separatist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruleoflawrevolution.com/?p=654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my continuing quest to point out how our familiar political labels are failing us, let me submit the following three scenarios. 1.  A man says aloud at a public gathering, &#8220;I&#8217;m against the recreational use of narcotics; it should be illegal.&#8221;  Everyone in the crowd thinks, &#8220;Ah, that guy&#8217;s a conservative.&#8221; 2.  Then on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2009/04/25/what-is-this-guy-a-liberal-or-a-conservative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is a &#8220;Republican&#8221;?  What is a &#8220;Democrat&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2009/04/25/what-is-a-republican-what-is-a-democrat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2009/04/25/what-is-a-republican-what-is-a-democrat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ruleoflawrestoration</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demublican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicrat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruleoflawrevolution.com/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In keeping with my general goal of trying to give deeper-than-normal thought to the trappings of our American political landscape, I thought it would be good to spend a few minutes with this important pair of questions. Most of us, I&#8217;d say, would have to &#8220;um&#8221; and &#8220;uh&#8221; a bit before we could formulate a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2009/04/25/what-is-a-republican-what-is-a-democrat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxes:  The perfect issue for Republicans in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2009/04/25/taxes-the-perfect-issue-for-republicans-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2009/04/25/taxes-the-perfect-issue-for-republicans-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ruleoflawrestoration</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax protests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruleoflawrevolution.com/?p=646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been exciting to see all the hubbub over the tax protests.  Seeing people get involved&#8212;hearing them voice their concerns&#8212;seeing the mainstream media have to decide whether to cover the protests favorably or critically. I have also noticed, however, that there seem always to be Republican politicians close at hand at the protests.  I&#8217;m not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruleoflawrestoration.com/2009/04/25/taxes-the-perfect-issue-for-republicans-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

